The next stage determines the relative acrylic tile extinctions
as a function of wavelength and the relative wavelength dependence
of the PMT efficiencies. For a given laserball position within 200cm of
the center of the AV (so photons are not too far from normal incidence
on AV and PSUP surfaces), sets of PMTS are chosen for which recorded photons
traverse a particular acrylic tile. This amounts to PMTs per tile.
After a first-order correction for the relative PMT efficiency above 400nm,
it is assumed that the median PMT efficiency at lower wavelengths based on any
such set of
tubes should be the same. Thus, after further
corrections to the observed prompt-peak intensity at each wavelength for solid
angle, D2O/H2O extinction and the Poisson probability for multiple hits within
a single laser pulse, observed variations in the median values corresponding
to each acrylic tile are taken to be the result of differences in the
relative optical extinction of that tile. These values and their estimated
uncertainties are assigned to the variables OCA_Rel_Acr(IW,NTile,1) and
OCA_Rel_Acr(IW,NTile,2), respectively, where
is the wavelength index of
the laserball and
is the acrylic tile number.
Furthermore, differences between each tube of a given set and the
corresponding median value is taken to represent small variations in the
wavelength dependence of the PMT/reflector efficiency. These values
and their estimated uncertainties are assigned to the variables
OCA_Rel_QE(IW,NPMT,1) and OCA_Rel_QE(IW,NPMT,2), respectively, where
is the PMT number.