diff options
author | tlatorre <tlatorre@uchicago.edu> | 2018-11-11 13:22:18 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | tlatorre <tlatorre@uchicago.edu> | 2018-11-11 13:22:18 -0600 |
commit | 8447870e721dd738bce12b45e732c9cc01dc2595 (patch) | |
tree | c0fc48881f2314b6a8223227676c664027d8a411 /src/muon.h | |
parent | a0876ec4863d22d6d20b2507e173071a58c4b342 (diff) | |
download | sddm-8447870e721dd738bce12b45e732c9cc01dc2595.tar.gz sddm-8447870e721dd738bce12b45e732c9cc01dc2595.tar.bz2 sddm-8447870e721dd738bce12b45e732c9cc01dc2595.zip |
update likelihood function to fit electrons!
To characterize the angular distribution of photons from an electromagnetic
shower I came up with the following functional form:
f(cos_theta) ~ exp(-abs(cos_theta-mu)^alpha/beta)
and fit this to data simulated using RAT-PAC at several different energies. I
then fit the alpha and beta coefficients as a function of energy to the
functional form:
alpha = c0 + c1/log(c2*T0 + c3)
beta = c0 + c1/log(c2*T0 + c3).
where T0 is the initial energy of the electron in MeV and c0, c1, c2, and c3
are parameters which I fit.
The longitudinal distribution of the photons generated from an electromagnetic
shower is described by a gamma distribution:
f(x) = x**(a-1)*exp(-x/b)/(Gamma(a)*b**a).
This parameterization comes from the PDG "Passage of particles through matter"
section 32.5. I also fit the data from my RAT-PAC simulation, but currently I
am not using it, and instead using a simpler form to calculate the coefficients
from the PDG (although I estimated the b parameter from the RAT-PAC data).
I also sped up the calculation of the solid angle by making a lookup table
since it was taking a significant fraction of the time to compute the
likelihood function.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/muon.h')
-rw-r--r-- | src/muon.h | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #define EULER_CONSTANT 0.57721 double muon_get_range(double T, double rho); +double muon_get_dEdx_rad(double T, double rho); double muon_get_dEdx(double T, double rho); #endif |