aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/.gitignore
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-07-15add *.hdf5 to .gitignoretlatorre
2019-06-02update .gitignoretlatorre
2018-12-11add a function to find peaks using a Hough transformtlatorre
2018-11-26update .gitignoretlatorre
2018-11-11update likelihood function to fit electrons!tlatorre
To characterize the angular distribution of photons from an electromagnetic shower I came up with the following functional form: f(cos_theta) ~ exp(-abs(cos_theta-mu)^alpha/beta) and fit this to data simulated using RAT-PAC at several different energies. I then fit the alpha and beta coefficients as a function of energy to the functional form: alpha = c0 + c1/log(c2*T0 + c3) beta = c0 + c1/log(c2*T0 + c3). where T0 is the initial energy of the electron in MeV and c0, c1, c2, and c3 are parameters which I fit. The longitudinal distribution of the photons generated from an electromagnetic shower is described by a gamma distribution: f(x) = x**(a-1)*exp(-x/b)/(Gamma(a)*b**a). This parameterization comes from the PDG "Passage of particles through matter" section 32.5. I also fit the data from my RAT-PAC simulation, but currently I am not using it, and instead using a simpler form to calculate the coefficients from the PDG (although I estimated the b parameter from the RAT-PAC data). I also sped up the calculation of the solid angle by making a lookup table since it was taking a significant fraction of the time to compute the likelihood function.
2018-10-03update .gitignoretlatorre
2018-08-27add code to expand the track of a particle using a KL expansiontlatorre
To fit the path of muons and electrons I use the Karhunen-Loeve expansion of a random 2D walk in the polar angle in x and y. This allows you to decompose the path into a sum over sine functions whose coefficients become random variables. The nice thing about fitting the path in this way is that you can capture *most* of the variation in the path using a small number of variables by only summing over the first N terms in the expansion and it is easy to calculate the probability of the coefficients since they are all uncorrelated.
2018-08-14initial commit of likelihood fit for muonstlatorre
This commit contains code to fit for the energy, position, and direction of muons in the SNO detector. Currently, we read events from SNOMAN zebra files and fill an event struct containing the PMT hits and fit it with the Nelder Mead simplex algorithm from GSL. I've also added code to read in ZEBRA title bank files to read in the DQXX files for a specific run. Any problems with channels in the DQCH and DQCR banks are flagged in the event struct by masking in a bit in the flags variable and these PMT hits are not included in the likelihood calculation. The likelihood for an event is calculated by integrating along the particle track for each PMT and computing the expected number of PE. The charge likelihood is then calculated by looping over all possible number of PE and computing: P(q|n)*P(n|mu) where q is the calibrated QHS charge, n is the number of PE, and mu is the expected number of photoelectrons. The latter is calculated assuming the distribution of PE at a given PMT follows a Poisson distribution (which I think should be correct given the track, but is probably not perfect for tracks which scatter a lot). The time part of the likelihood is calculated by integrating over the track for each PMT and calculating the average time at which the PMT is hit. We then assume the PDF for the photons to arrive is approximately a delta function and compute the first order statistic for a given time to compute the probability that the first photon arrived at a given time. So far I've only tested this with single tracks but the method was designed to be easy to use when you are fitting for multiple particles.
2018-07-04add a test of the get_solid_angle functiontlatorre
2018-07-04initial commit of a function to calculate the solid angle subtended by a ↵tlatorre
circular disk
2018-05-01initial committlatorre